The minute
- The Philippine Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) adopted a 2026-2030 roadmap for the voluntary forest carbon market through Administrative Order No. 2026-02, covering policy, monitoring, institutional capacity, and market development.
- The country’s updated NDC maintains a 75% emissions reduction and avoidance target for 2025-2035, of which 7% is unconditional and 68% depends on international support, and now includes forestry and other land use (FOLU), which could reduce cumulative emissions by about 2.3 billion tonnes of CO₂e against the baseline.
- The Philippines has 7.23 million hectares of remaining forest but no nationally issued carbon credits so far; only two projects are registered under Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard, with four more in the pipeline and at least nine outside the Verra system.
Why it matters: The Philippines is attempting to build an entire carbon market infrastructure from near zero while simultaneously raising its climate ambition. The roadmap signals intent, but the gap between a policy document and functioning credit issuance is wide. For international buyers and project developers watching Southeast Asia, the question is whether the Philippines can build credible systems fast enough to compete with neighbors like Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand, all of which are further ahead in carbon market development.
What remains undecided, and what needs to happen
The roadmap itself flags several unresolved structural problems. Carbon ownership rights in the Philippines lack a clear legal framework. The DENR requires developers to submit benefit-sharing plans, but the roadmap acknowledges that guidance on how revenue should actually be distributed does not yet exist. For projects on ancestral domains, Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is required, but the operational protocols connecting FPIC to carbon credit issuance are still being developed.
The planned DENR Forest Carbon Credit Database, meant to track projects and credits, is not yet operational. It is designed to connect with a broader national carbon registry under the country’s Article 6 framework, but that registry is also under construction. Without functioning registries, the Philippines cannot offer buyers the assurance against double counting that international markets now demand. The country is currently only an observer in the ASEAN Common Carbon Framework, not a full participant, which limits its access to regional market infrastructure.
The 1.2 million hectares of classified forest land identified as priority investment areas and the additional 1.5 million hectares being assessed for possible release represent potential supply. But potential is not issuance. Turning those hectares into verified credits requires baselines, monitoring systems, and project-level validation that the roadmap is only beginning to put in place.
How Brazil’s carbon market path compares
Brazil offers a useful contrast. The country enacted Law 15.042 in December 2024, creating the Sistema Brasileiro de Comércio de Emissões (SBCE), a regulated emissions trading system. The Philippines, by comparison, is building a voluntary market framework without a regulated cap-and-trade mechanism behind it. Brazil’s law establishes a compliance market for facilities emitting above a defined threshold, with the voluntary market operating alongside it. The Philippine roadmap addresses only the voluntary side.
On forest carbon specifically, Brazil already has a long track record of project development under international standards like Verra and Gold Standard, with REDD+ projects operating in the Amazon and Atlantic Forest for over a decade. The Philippines, with zero nationally issued credits at the time of its own stocktake, is at a fundamentally earlier stage. Brazil’s forest area is also on a different scale entirely, making the Philippine figure of 7.23 million hectares modest by comparison.
Both countries, however, share a common challenge: benefit sharing with local and Indigenous communities. Brazil’s SBCE law requires regulation on how carbon revenues reach traditional communities and Indigenous Peoples, and that regulation is still being written. The Philippines faces the same gap. In both cases, the credibility of forest credits will depend on whether communities see real returns, not just whether satellites confirm tree cover.
What this means for Brazilian companies
For Brazilian firms active in the voluntary carbon market, either as project developers or as buyers, the Philippine roadmap is a signal of growing competition for nature-based credit supply in Asia. Southeast Asian jurisdictions are building frameworks that could attract the same pool of international buyers that currently sources credits from Latin America. If Philippine and ASEAN credits gain credibility and achieve interoperability through regional frameworks, they could put downward pressure on prices for similar REDD+ and reforestation credits globally.
Brazilian developers with experience in forest carbon methodology, monitoring, and community engagement could also find consulting or co-development opportunities in the Philippines, where the DENR has explicitly stated it wants to align with business concepts. The global shortfall in forest finance (the source cites $2.2 billion per year in current investment against a need exceeding $450 billion annually) means multiple regions will be competing for the same capital, and Brazilian market participants should watch how fast Asian supply matures.
There is no newsletter yet. Leave your email and you will hear first on the day there is one.